Dear Brewtiful: A Reader Tipped Us About the Invictus Games Finances. We Investigated
A Reader Sent Us a Tip About the Invictus Games Finances.
We Pulled the Accounts.
Dear Brewtiful,
I am writing to draw your attention to a story about the finances of the Invictus Games. A researcher named Rachel Maxwell — she runs the YouTube channel Rachel the Curious Pilot — has been going through the public accounts and what she has found is significant. Millions of dollars. Redacted budgets. Veterans receiving virtually nothing. Taxpayers footing a very large bill with very few questions being asked.
I saw your recent article on Meghan Markle and I thought: this is exactly the kind of story that deserves a Brewtiful treatment. Not the YouTube version. The documented version. The numbers. The receipts. The accounting.
I believe it deserves more attention than it has received. I hope you agree.
— A Reader Who Has Been Paying Attention · Name withheld by requestWe agree.
We received this letter on May 18, 2026 — the same day the site had its biggest traffic day in its history, which felt like a sign that the universe had opinions about timing. We looked into it. We went to the UK Charity Commission. We found the annual accounts. We read the Freedom of Information documents. We tracked the corporate sponsor exits. We followed the Australian budget announcement. We read Tom Bower's book. We read Paula Froelich's NewsNation reporting and her Substack, which has been doing serious and sustained work on this story. And then we wrote a 4,900-word piece about what we found.
The short version, before we send you to the long version: the numbers are real, they are public, and they do not tell a flattering story about an organisation that depends on public trust and public money to function. Here is what we found.
WHAT THE READER WAS RIGHT ABOUT
The Invictus Games Foundation filed its 2024 annual accounts with the UK Charity Commission two years late. When they arrived, the numbers raised immediate questions — not because they proved wrongdoing, but because of what they showed about where the money was going, and where it was not.
Direct grants to veteran organisations: Cut from £534,973 to £200,328 — a 63% reduction in one year
Foundation income: Up 41% in the same year
Cash reserves: Grew from £431,950 to £2.3 million — a 430% increase
Legal fees: Jumped from £45,000 to £150,000 with no public explanation
Highest-paid staff member: £120,000–£130,000 — above UK charity sector norms
Dunes LLC (American for-profit, no stated purpose): Received £29,800 in 2023, nothing in 2024 — no explanation given either year
Source: UK Charity Commission · Invictus Games Foundation Annual Accounts 2024
The reader was right that veterans are receiving less. In the same year the foundation's income rose 41% and its cash reserves grew by 430%, the money going directly to wounded veteran organisations dropped by 63%. That is not an interpretation. That is the filing.
THE VANCOUVER QUESTION NOBODY ASKED LOUDLY ENOUGH
The 2025 Invictus Games in Vancouver and Whistler cost $63.2 million Canadian for 543 competitors. That works out to $118,352 per athlete. The U.S. Warrior Games — a comparable adaptive sports competition run by the Department of Defense — operates on roughly $2 million annually. Germany runs a similar competition for about $200,000. Nobody has yet provided a clear public accounting of what the additional $61 million buys.
Roughly half the Vancouver budget came from Canadian taxpayers, routed through the British Columbia government and the federal government. The licensing fee paid to the Invictus Games Foundation — the British charity that owns the brand — was in the government contract documents. Those figures were redacted. When researcher Rachel Maxwell published the redacted document, the Invictus Canada website went down within three hours. When it returned, the document was gone and the site had been restructured to require a Dropbox account to download anything — so the organisation could track who was accessing its public files.
"That's life-changing money. Would the veterans have preferred $117,000 to purchase new prosthetics, to make their house ADA compliant, to purchase vehicles that could support their wheelchairs?"
— Rachel Maxwell, Rachel the Curious Pilot · speaking to NewsNation / Paula FroelichWHAT IS HAPPENING RIGHT NOW WITH INVICTUS GAMES 2027
This is where the story gets more current — and more urgent. The next Invictus Games are scheduled for Birmingham, England, from July 10–17, 2027. Birmingham is the UK's second city. It is also a city that declared effective bankruptcy in September 2023, exited that status in February 2026, and committed £30 million of public money to secure the Invictus bid while the UK government added another £26 million. The projected operating cost is between £30 million and £60 million.
With 15 months to go, here is the current sponsorship picture: 11 corporate sponsors contributing an estimated £4 million combined. Boeing — which was the co-presenting sponsor for Vancouver 2025 — has confirmed it will not be participating in Birmingham. Only Deloitte has been publicly named as an Official Partner, and part of its contribution is in professional services rather than cash. Individual donations are described as near nonexistent. The vice chairman of the Birmingham 2027 board, Melloney Poole, resigned this week. She has not said why.
People are searching for Invictus 2027 in increasing numbers — specifically around whether Harry will invite King Charles, who will be attending, and what the Games will look like. What they are not yet finding in those searches is a clear, documented account of the financial questions surrounding the organisation running those Games. That gap is exactly what the full investigation is for.
ON RACHEL MAXWELL AND WHY SHE DESERVES CREDIT
The reader who wrote to us specifically mentioned Rachel Maxwell and asked whether her work would get wider coverage. The answer, as of this week, is yes — but it took time, and it took journalists like Paula Froelich picking up the thread and bringing it to a mainstream outlet. Rachel filed Freedom of Information requests. She obtained the redacted BC government documents. She published the Charity Commission account analysis. She is the reason this story exists in its current form. We are not going to write about this story without saying that clearly.
Her YouTube channel is Rachel the Curious Pilot. Her Instagram is Montecito Minimalist. If this story matters to you, she is where it started.
WHAT DEAR BREWTIFUL IS FOR
This letter is the reason Dear Brewtiful exists. Not for advice columns about situationships, though we do those too and with genuine enthusiasm. For moments when a reader knows something, or suspects something, or has been following a story that deserves more oxygen — and sends it in because they trust that it will be handled properly.
It was. It is. The full investigation is live. The receipts are in it. The Charity Commission accounts are cited. The FOI documents are referenced. The source — Rachel Maxwell — is credited by name with links. This is what happens when a reader tips Brewtiful Living and the tip has receipts attached.
If you have something — a story, a tip, a document, a very specific financial question about a celebrity charity operation — the inbox is open. All correspondence handled with discretion. Names withheld by default unless you say otherwise.
The reader was right. The story was there. The accounts are public. The numbers are real. The foundation that cuts grants to veterans by 63% while its own income rises 41% and its reserves grow 430% has not responded to a single press inquiry. Birmingham 2027 is 15 months away, Boeing has left, Australia has left, a board member has left, and the organisation still has not explained the legal fees or Dunes LLC. This is what accountability journalism looks like when a reader points at something and says: look. We looked. Send your tips. We will keep looking.
Have a question, a tip, a receipt, or something you need an honest opinion on? Dear Brewtiful is always open. All letters handled with discretion. Names withheld unless you say otherwise.
Send a Letter to Dear Brewtiful →